Tag Archives: UTI bladder problems

Vesica Procedure Gives Birth to Pelvic Mesh – Pre 1996

[Trigger warning: This story contains graphic surgical details.]
If you have a retropubic bladder sling, you may want to get familiar with the procedure that paved the way for yours and all pelvic meshes. The Vesica technique was used to implant the ProteGen, the evil grandmother of all transvaginal mesh.

The story below was pieced together from historical patent applications, MAUDE reports, and donated personal stories in order to create a composite patient with the pseudonym Abbey Nordell. On the day of her operation for a little bladder leak, her surgeon, Brian Malikoff (also a pseudonym), asked the young woman who peed when she sneezed to sign a consent for a “Vesica Procedure” before he headed off to “scrub in.”

A short while later, Nordell was flat on the table, covered with a sheet,  ankles in stirrups when Malikoff swept into the operating room.. After saying hello, Malikoff watched his sedated patient drift off to sleep. Pushing his foot on a floor pedal, he tilted the table backward until his patient’s head was lower than her hips. The circulating nurse adjusted a powerful light behind his head until the young doctor could visualize the area of Abbey’s body she normally kept very private.
With a gloved hand, Malikoff unfalteringly inserted a sixteen-millimeter diameter Foley catheter, pushed a tablespoon of water through it and inflated her bladder just enough to feel her urethra through the front wall of her vagina with the other. Next, he took a pair of sharp tipped scissors and cut open a hatch-door-shaped flap at the top front of her vagina. He Exchanged the sharp scissors for blunt-tipped ones and, keeping them closed, swept the tips back and forth through the space outside of her vaginal canal, the periurethral fascia (periurethral fascia includes the obturator fascia, covers the pelvic walls formed primarily by muscles that pass from the interior of the pelvis to the thigh), until he separated her bladder from her vagina.

Illustration from Vesica Patent

The fascia around Nordell’s urethra is part of an uninterrupted head-to-toe system that surrounds and permeates every tissue in her body: organ, bone, muscle, skin, nerve, artery or vein. Fascial structures are made of collagenous tissue which is pre-loaded with tension and can stretch or compress in many directions without losing strength. They act as a lubricant to the surrounding surfaces. Cuts to Nordell’s fascia will heal, but will become scarred, more rigid, and change shape. To Malikoff, this was a reasonable trade-off with an acceptable risk-benefit ratio (a complex decision that balances the degree of illness or injury, the patient’s age and health, especially circulatory health, how well the patient is responding to non-surgical treatments, the patient’s feelings about surgery, and how much risk there is for surgical complications).
On each side of Nordell’s incision, Malikoff separated further using both sharp and blunt tools, cutting sideways as far as possible to avoid injuring her bladder and urethra. He then punctured her endopelvic fascia (Endopelvic fascia includes the obturator fascia, covers the pelvic walls formed primarily by muscles that pass from the interior of the pelvis to the thigh) behind her pubic bone and cut a path wide enough to pass a large darning needle-shaped instrument known as a “Stamey needle.” (Stamey needle: used for pulling sutures from a vaginal incision into the suprapubic area during bladder suspension surgery. This needle is reusable.) He then made a half-inch long incision deep enough to reach the next fascial area rectus fascia (thin but very tough layer that covers the abdominal muscles) above her pubic bone where he would soon anchor a suture. The circulating nurse opened a sterile package containing a Vesica kit and carefully dropped the contents onto the Mayo Stand (metal table that holds surgical instruments): two screws with sutures attached and a tube-shaped drill guide.

Two examples of anchor fixation devices

Still gloved, Malikoff grasped a tube-shaped drill guide and used it to insert a tiny anchor. He located specific internal landmarks at the back of Nordell’s pubic bone with his fingertip and aimed the head of the guide into the bone’s periosteum (dense fibrous membrane covering the surface of bones) and twisted the first tiny screw until it was securely seated. The second screw was not so easy. When he realized he accidentally twisted it into a ligament, his heart stopped. Unable to back it out, he cut the errant suture lose with a tiny saw Boston Scientific provided for this kind of mishap and requested a second Vesica kit to access a third screw. (The misplaced screw remained inside her body for years to come. She discovered it many years later.)*

Pubic bone

Malikoff then pulled the two properly secured sutures around her urethra and up through the incision above her pubis. After placing two fingers through her vagina and between the sutures and her urethra he estimated the amount of tension and then tied the ends above with a square knot “I’ll tie eight knots just to be sure. We don’t want this unraveling,” he said to no one in particular.
To make sure there was no injury to Nordell’s urethra and that the sutures were not to tight, Malikoff passed a cyctoscope (slender, cylindrical camera for examining the interior of the urinary bladder) into her bladder to look for signs of perforation. Happy there were none, he closed her vaginal and suprapubic incisions with absorbable sutures, inserted a Foley catheter and vaginal packing and signaled the anesthesiologist to wake her up.
* * *
Nordell’s procedure never worked to stop her leakage but put her into a world of pain. She began to suffer from UTI’s and the sutures cut her husband making love-making an ordeal.
The F.D.A. provides a place to report disasters like Nordell’s but the vast majority of tragic outcomes never make it there. Doctors are not required to report complications and company representatives rarely follow the reporting mandate. Medical personnel, lawyers, and patients themselves can report negative experiences to M.A.U.D.E. (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience), however. That’s how we know that, before pelvic mesh caused a slew of problems, patients were already suffering.
Look for more stories about other mesh inventions as I attempt to cover each different type of pelvic mesh.

* * *

*When the circulating nurse cleaned up after the surgery, she threw away a small folded paper that dropped out of the Vesica Kit package called the “instructions for use” (IFU). Those instructions recommended surgeons prepare for Vesica procedure surgery by planning in advance a way to replace “dropped, contaminated, mal-positioned or non-working screws” and by having extra supplies and extraction tools on hand—as Malikoff had done.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Peggy Day is working on a book to combine all these stories. This is an excerpt from . Your input is welcome to help make Pelvic Mesh Owner Guide the book you need to read.

If you’d like to join an online support group and learn about erosion, partial removals, surgeons, or just find out that you are not alone, join my group, Surgical Mesh or check the list of support groups here.

Subscribe to PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com to learn more about pelvic mesh. I’d like to hear from you if you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic. Comment below or email me privately at daywriter1@gmail.com.

twitter-iconfacebook-icon



Why So Many Deaths From Monarc Slings? Pelvic Mesh Disasters

The FDA received 193 reports of death after Monarc Subfacial Hammock placements—by far the highest number for a specific brand of pelvic mesh. The FDA MAUDE system admits their reports are notoriously unreliable for accurate statistics.  It isn’t inconceivable that the number is nearer to thousands because the Government Accounted Office estimated only about 1% of complications are reported. (Physicians aren’t mandated to report illnesses, deaths, or injuries.) If the one percent statistic is accurate, then 19,300 deaths have occurred. Given that 4.5 million women across the globe had pelvic mesh implants, it is entirely possible.

With the FDA’s blessings, American Medical Systems rolled out the Monarc in 2005. The half-inch wide strip of loosely-knitted, clear polypropylene monofilament sling came with two stainless steel curved needle passers with plastic-handles that looked like grappling hooks. The top of each passer is intended to grab the ends of the sling and pull it through the vagina and obturator membrane. The sling assembly also included two plastic insertion sheaths attached to the mesh and removed after placement. An absorbable tensioning suture, threaded lengthwise through the mesh, allowed the surgeon to adjust the tension before closing the surgery. AMS declared the mesh would remain in the body permanently.

Illustration used under Fair Use Act for Educational Purposes

AMS’s illustration (and it’s understanding of female anatomy?) of the obturator was pictured as a vacant space with no purpose, but in reality, it is flush with blood vessels and nerves supplying the bladder, vagina, vulva, and hips. Those were more vulnerable to injury than AMS acknowledged.

On October 15, 2014, the FDA issued a recall for Monarc sling passers along with other AMS products due to compromised sterile packaging.

If the sterile packaging was the only problem, the deaths might be predominantly due to infection, but the MAUDE death reports include autoimmune diseases like diabetes and several types of cancer (e.g., lymphoma, large and small cell, and lung cancers).

Jenny Wallace (pseudonym) traded her prolapsing bladder for urinary tract infections, pain, infection, vaginal scarring, urinary problems, adhesions, recurrence, emotional distress, apical mesh erosion, extruded vaginal mesh, and bleeding. She was implanted with a Monarc in 2008. She underwent several partial removals and, on October 24, 2010, died of metastatic small cell cancer.

More research needs to be done to determine why Monarc has so many more death reports than other products and to quantify types of death. But, for now, if you have a Monarc, you might consider having it removed by a competent removal surgeon. Fortunately, AMS no longer sells slings.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Peggy Day is working on a book to combine all these stories. This is an excerpt from Pelvis in Flames: Your Pelvic Mesh Owner’s Guide. Your input is welcome to help make Pelvis in Flames the book you need to read.

If you’d like to join an online support group and learn about erosion, partial removals, surgeons, or just find out that you are not alone, join my group, Surgical Mesh or check the list of support groups here.

Subscribe to PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com to learn more about pelvic mesh. I’d like to hear from you if you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic. Comment below or email me privately at daywriter1@gmail.com.

twitter-iconfacebook-icon



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monarc™ Subfascial Hammock

Childbirth Leads to Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Adult Incontinence. Here’s How

Mother Jones recently published an article that should be required reading for women suffering from pelvic organ prolapse.

“The list of ways in which the pelvis and reproductive organs can be damaged during this process is practically endless. Most women, as mentioned, experience at least some vaginal tearing. But in severe cases, the perineum—the area between the vagina and the anus—rips completely open (http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/labor-and-delivery/multimedia/vaginal-tears/sls- 20077129?s=5) , exposing the vagina to dangerous bacteria and leaving the mother unable to control her bowels. Sometimes, as in Claire’s case, the baby is too big to fit easily through the pelvis, and the infant’s head or shoulders can break the mother’s bones on the way out. In yet another harrowing scenario, a piece of the placenta remains stuck to the uterine wall after the baby is born, causing the woman to hemorrhage. If the pelvic floor muscles stretch too far during delivery, the uterus may sag into the vagina: prolapse. And even after a woman heals from her immediate injuries, she can experience chronic nerve pain, muscle spasms, or numbness for months or years. Plenty of women make it through a birth okay, only to suffer from incontinence or prolapse years or decades later, for reasons doctors still don’t understand.”
The Scary Truth About Childbirth | Mother Jones

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peggy Day is working on a book to combine all these stories. This is an excerpt from Pelvis in Flames: Your Pelvic Mesh Owner’s Guide. Your input is welcome to help make Pelvis in Flames the book you need to read.

If you’d like to join an online support group and learn about erosion, partial removals, surgeons, or just find out that you are not alone, join my group, Surgical Mesh or check the list of support groups here.

Subscribe to PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com to learn more about pelvic mesh. I’d like to hear from you if you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic. Comment below or email me privately at daywriter1@gmail.com..

twitter-iconfacebook-icon


10 Facts of Life for the Pelvic Mesh Newbie

  1. Mesh injuries and illness rates are much higher than medical studies show. Most published research favorable to mesh is funded by the manufacturer.
  2. Mesh is mesh. There is no “old mesh.” It is all that same thing with minor changes in shape or route. Polypropylene is just plain damaging to human tissue.
  3. The pelvis is a perilous place to conduct surgery. Even human or pig mesh or simple suture repairs can cause problems–but not as frequently as pelvic mesh.
  4. Your new pelvic problem is very likely caused by the mesh itself. Fearing litigation and believing the manufacturer’s advertising, doctors are reluctant to blame the device.
  5. Some pain and infection get better with removal–but not all.

    KIM Mesh

  6. Very few surgeons know how to take mesh out, so they fake it with partial revision surgeries that lead to new complications and more surgeries. More surgeries = more scar tissue.
  7. There is no justice. There are almost no medical malpractice lawsuits anymore. There is no money in malpractice litigation for the lawyers since “Tort Reform” was enacted in all 50 states. Doctors and the AMA lobbied and paid for Tort Reform.
  8. About class actions, there is no money for a lawyer who represents a patient with pain, infection, nerve damage, etc. because recent settlements are based on the number of surgeries you’ve had and not how sick or injured you are.
  9. Don’t wait for legal recourse before finding a competent surgeon. Consider crowd-funding to get well.
  10. You shouldn’t have to do this alone. Join a mesh support group but keep a critical mind and don’t accept advice just because another person is adamant in their post Be careful. Be sure to double check any answers you receive. A good internet search can provide your best education.

 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peggy Day is working on a book to combine all these stories. This is an excerpt from Pelvis in Flames: Your Pelvic Mesh Owner’s Guide. Your input is welcome to help make Pelvis in Flames the book you need to read.

If you’d like to join an online support group and learn about erosion, partial removals, surgeons, or just find out that you are not alone, check the list of support groups here.

Subscribe to PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com to learn more about pelvic mesh. I’d like to hear from you if you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic. Comment below or email me privately at daywriter1@gmail.com.

    • If you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic, comment below or email me privately at

daywriter1@gmail.com

    .

twitter-iconfacebook-icon


UPDATE: Australian Pelvic Mesh – Carolyn Chisholm

UPDATE: Carolyn (Caz) Chisholm, of Perth Australia, started a search three years ago to find a surgeon and a hospital to sponsor a visit by Dr. Dionysios Veronikis (St. Louis, Missouri) to Australia because is skilled in the removal of pelvic mesh devices from women that no Australian surgeon can. Today, women must travel to the United States to have pelvic mesh removed in its entirety. Veronikis invented equipment to reach deep into the pelvis to retrieve mesh that no Aussie surgeons can reach. He’s removed more than 2000 meshes.

Larger prolapse meshes are very complicated and dangerous to remove, and it takes a special surgeon to remove them. Dr. Veronikis designed and patented specialized pelvic mesh removal equipment and instruments, which no other surgeon in the world has.

Recently, Caz left her leadership role in the Australian pelvic support group to devote her time and efforts to finding a surgeon and a hospital to sponsor a visit from Dr. Veronikis in the hopes that he would teach Aussie surgeons safe mesh removal techniques.

Like anti-mesh advocates across the globe, Aussie’s leaders do not like mesh or support mesh. They do not believe in partial removals and encourage full removal wherever possible to minimize the trauma to women. They want Australia to have the same removal possibilities that the U.S. does.

“This is a huge undertaking, and it involves a hell of a lot of work from numerous people including mesh-injured women themselves. Unfortunately, the RANZCOG (Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists) stand by their statement that a partial removal is an acceptable form of treatment. They refuse to get on board with full removal procedures  [even though] when pain occurs the only way is to remove all of the mesh,” wrote Chisholm.

Aussie injured women do not agree with RANZCOG’s and Professor Vancaille’s position about partial removal because “every single woman who has had this procedure ends up with more complications, [goes] back into hospital for more surgery, and often ends up with infections that don’t go away and [long-term] antibiotics.”

Aussie activists also try to help mesh injured women find pain specialists, accurate diagnoses, psychological help, and referrals to competent mesh removal surgeons—even if it means traveling half-way across the world.

Caz distinguishes between mesh used to treat prolapse and that used to treat urinary incontinence. Prolapse mesh is considered “high risk” by FDA officials but the SUI meshes are treated as the “gold standard.” There are no long-term studies proving the use of mesh is safe or efficacious. “RANZCOG states the clinical trials still need to be done for the SUI meshes; so this means that women are still guinea pigs,” wrote Chisholm.

She says women are being implanted with mesh unnecessarily and afterward, their GP’s don’t know how to treat them, and gynecologists deny care by saying their new problems are not related to mesh (duplicating the actions of doctors in the U.S. and all other countries). “These surgeons don’t want to know anything about the complications that their implants have caused women. In fact, I have read stories about surgeons being rude to the women, some shout at them, some get angry with them, simply because the woman is presenting with pain and complications. They are turning their backs on the women.

“It is diabolical what is happening. This is why we need t

Caz Chisholm winning two awards for her advocacy work.

o set up clinics Australia wide and find ethical and empathetic surgeons who want to be trained in full removal and to find the right medical professionals that really want to listen to these women, to believe them and not turn them away. It is a very specialised issue and needs to be addressed immediately,” the determined activist added.

Caz Chisholm won two awards for her advocacy work.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peggy Day is working on a book to combine all these stories. This is an excerpt from Pelvis in Flames: Your Pelvic Mesh Owner’s Guide. Your input is welcome to help make Pelvis in Flames the book you need to read.

If you’d like to join an online support group and learn about erosion, partial removals, surgeons, or just find out that you are not alone, join my group, Surgical Mesh or check the list of support groups here.

Subscribe to PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com to learn more about pelvic mesh. I’d like to hear from you if you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic. Comment below or email me privately at daywriter1@gmail.com..

twitter-iconfacebook-icon


What Does a Bladder Really Look Like? Pelvic Mesh Implants

The bladder and urethra play a key role in pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. The most frequent cause of SUI is early bladder prolapse.

Figure 1. Illustration from patent application 2004. “u” is called a urethra. “B” is called a bladder.

As we age, the bladder loses support from neighboring fascia, muscles, ligaments and tendons and drops down, folding itself over supporting structures underneath (and over any slings or sutures in the pelvis). The folding narrows the outlet or urethra. Imagine you are holding a rolled up throw rug under one arm to carry it, it folds over and the hole inside it narrows and flattens.

Figure 2. Offset oil funnel.

Mesh illustrations in journal articles, public information handouts, and patent applications are inaccurately show the urethra as a straw-shaped tube through which urine flows. See example in Figure 1. It is really a sideways funnel — “offset” like the photo of the oil funnel in Figure 2. Figure 3. is a healthy bladder.

Figure 3. Healthy non-prolapsing bladder.

How in the world did the patent office and the FDA clear this product, a mesh tape with wing-like extensions for treating female urinary incontinence US 8047982 B2, when the illustration clearly shows a tube and the device is designed to fit a straight tube?

It is no wonder patients become confused.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peggy Day is working on a book to combine all these stories. This is an excerpt from Pelvis in Flames: Your Pelvic Mesh Owner’s Guide. Your input is welcome to help make Pelvis in Flames the book you need to read.

If you’d like to join an online support group and learn about erosion, partial removals, surgeons, or just find out that you are not alone, join my group, Surgical Mesh or check the list of support groups here.

Subscribe to PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com to learn more about pelvic mesh. I’d like to hear from you if you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic. Comment below or email me privately at daywriter1@gmail.com..

twitter-iconfacebook-icon


Specialized MRI and 3D Ultrasound See Mesh – CT Can’t

Too many surgeons are sending patients to have a CT (Cat Scan) and,  when the radiologist says he/she can’t see mesh, tell the patient the mesh must have disappeared or dissolved when a CT cannot identify mesh. Plastic mesh does not dissolve. Sadly too many patients have their pain disrespected or disregarded when the problem is the doctor’s. Only specialized 3D Ultrasound with the right technician and radiologist (more on this coming in another blog soon) and specialized MRI’s with the skills to see it and read it can identify mesh.
Here is a graphic, courtesy of www.scbtmr.org that you can print out an take to your doctor.

MRI to find mesh

How to see mesh with an MRI

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peggy Day is working on a book to combine all these stories. This is an excerpt from Pelvis in Flames: Your Pelvic Mesh Owner’s Guide. Your input is welcome to help make Pelvis in Flames the book you need to read.

If you’d like to join an online support group and learn about erosion, partial removals, surgeons, or just find out that you are not alone, join my group, Surgical Mesh or check the list of support groups here.

Subscribe to PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com to learn more about pelvic mesh. I’d like to hear from you if you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic. Comment below or email me privately at daywriter1@gmail.com..

twitter-iconfacebook-icon



Peggy Day is working on a book to combine all these stories. This is an excerpt from Pelvis in Flames: Your Pelvic Mesh Owner’s Guide. Your input is welcome to help make Pelvis in Flames the book you need to read.

If you’d like to join an online support group and learn about erosion, partial removals, surgeons, or just find out that you are not alone, check the list of support groups here.

Subscribe to PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com to learn more about pelvic mesh. I’d like to hear from you if you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic. Comment below or email me privately at daywriter1@gmail.com.

        • If you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic, comment below or email me privately at

daywriter1@gmail.com

      • .

twitter-iconfacebook-icon


Forty Percent Failure Rate and Erosion Rate! Polypropylene is Not Fit For Humans

“For the want of a nail the shoe was lost,
For the want of a shoe the horse was lost,
For the want of a horse the rider was lost,
For the want of a rider the battle was lost,
For the want of a battle the kingdom was lost,
And all for the want of a horseshoe-nail.” Benjamin Franklin

Polypropylene has been found to be responsible for more deaths than just mesh patients as a recent examination of MAUDE reports to the FDA reveals. Meanwhile the plastic surgical mesh continues to be sold to patients.

The FDA’s recent announcement that it would reclassify only one application for pelvic mesh is a disaster for anyone wanting to do no harm because in its statement the agency promoted the use of synthetic surgical mesh for other pelvic applications. The only way to protect women from harm and avoid severe and devastating complications is to pressure the FDA to take all synthetic surgical mesh off the market—for good. A failure rate of forty percent (between 37.8 and 44.2%) and an erosion rate of 41.5% percent (see Figure 1. Lee, SY) represents an unacceptable iatrogenic mass casualty no matter how you toss the dice. It’s not the application (vaginal vs abdominal) or the surgical technique that’s harming many thousands of patients, it’s the material itself: the polypropylene.

Screen Shot 2016-01-15 at 8.44.26 AM

Polypropylene begins its life as crude oil, like any plastic product. Polypropylene is made up of a combination of ingredients combined to produce a product that will resist temperature change and keep its tensile strength when shaped into strands. Microscopically, polypropylene is a polymer—a large molecule composed of many repeating subunits. When polypropylene is stretched into a fiber, its strength is dependent on the quality of ingredients, the width of the strand, and the shape the strand.

438px-Polypropylene_tacticity.svg

Polypropylene Chain

Polypropylene is a favorite child of plastics scientists for containers, automobile parts, rugs, and countless other applications often illustrated on this blog. Patients are told the device is inert, completely safe, does not react with the body yet, it is the same material that is used to make thousands of household 81YYBL4yzwL._SY355_products, like scouring pads. Imagine taking Scotch-Brite Scrub pad and stuffing it into your most private spot.

Polypropylene reactions: Although marketers call mesh inert, when polypropylene materials come in contact with human tissue, both sides of the interchange suffer in very dramatic ways. Plastic mesh reacts, degrades, shrinks, curls, rolls, or migrates in a woman’s body. The human host is vulnerable to allergic reactions, foreign body responses, organ injury and migration of the material. If a patient reacts badly, she is in an alarming predicament: it is nearly impossible to take pelvic mesh out.

Allergic reactions to polypropylene are said to be rare and it is nearly impossible to predict who will react. Allergists disagree on what testing method to use to diagnose an allergy to polypropylene. Foreign body responses are much more common. A few pathologists took a look at hernia mesh and all of the samples they examined demonstrated rejection responses.

POLY IS FOR COAXIAL CABLESAlthough allergists believe that polypropylene carried a low allergic response, they say the longer it is left in the body, the more likely a reaction will occur. The skin is said to spit out a suture sometimes but it is nearly impossible for a body to spit out pelvic mesh.

The same material used in transvaginal mesh was once declared unfit for the human body. In 2013, lawyers uncovered emails showing that CRBard, tried to deny the company knew it was unfit until prosecution lawyers forced them to divulge secret company emails. On Thursday this week, Mostlyn Law filed an injunction against Boston Scientific alleging the corporation smuggled a resin which it added to pelvic mesh products between 2011 and 2012.

•∞•

Recently, I looked at who died from mesh and tripped onto a little known fact–one polypropylene suture, Prolene, was involved in one tenth of the deaths from Ethicon Corporation products—a quarter of all suture-related deaths reported to MedWatch. Over the past decade, Prolene failures were found in 39 of 417 Ethicon product deaths yet the FDA never warned the public about the suture and there is no evidence that the agency is even aware of the problem. MAUDE event descriptions characterized failures leading to deaths from breaks in the suture or knots which unraveled. Reading the stories, I could only imagine the surgeon’s umbrage. After many hours of high-risk surgery where he carefully applied his many years of training and masterful skills to save his patient’s life, he lost his patient—through no fault of his own. A piece of polypropylene suture broke or failed. “All for the want of a nail.”

Prolene maude deaths

Until polypropylene is removed from all medical devices, sadly, women and men will continue to suffer and die.

•∞•

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peggy Day is working on a book to combine all these stories. This is an excerpt from Pelvis in Flames: Your Pelvic Mesh Owner’s Guide. Your input is welcome to help make Pelvis in Flames the book you need to read.

If you’d like to join an online support group and learn about erosion, partial removals, surgeons, or just find out that you are not alone, join my group, Surgical Mesh or check the list of support groups here.

Subscribe to PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com to learn more about pelvic mesh. I’d like to hear from you if you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic. Comment below or email me privately at daywriter1@gmail.com..

twitter-iconfacebook-icon


It’s Not Your Fault – By DebC

Below is an excerpt from another blog, MESHMENOT, by DebC who makes a very important point, especially for women. Simply put, it is not your fault that you had mesh implanted.

It Is Not Your Fault
Are you suffering from mesh complications and feeling guilty for “allowing” mesh to be implanted in your body in the first place?
Well then, I think, that you should think again.
No one  suffering from mesh complications should be feeling guilty.  This is not the patient/victim’s fault.  They should not have known better.  Nobody that is mesh-injured should be blaming themselves regardless of what kind of mesh it was or when they had it implanted.
Many who get mesh are not even given all the facts and options upfront.  I’ve heard from many who did not even know their doctor planned to use mesh until after the fact. The sad truth is that if you walk into almost any doctor’s office today and say you pee a little when you sneeze, he (or she) will probably recommend mesh, despite two FDA warnings, FDA adverse event reports of severe complications, and over 100,000 lawsuits.
Most likely, when you visited your doctor, he downplayed your valid concerns. He may have said the mesh, or tape, or sling he used is not the same thing that’s in the news and he’s chosen a safer product. He may have said his product was your only option. Serious and debilitating mesh complications rarely are acknowledged by most members of the medical community, so those who seek a second or third opinions find no real answers.
You are not to blame. When it comes down to it, most people trust their doctors. Period. That’s what we were taught to do: listen to our doctor.We are not medical professionals and some doctors will take advantage of that, chastising us for searching for answers online and trying to diagnosing our own complications. Many doctors take offense when their skills are questioned but, fortunately, there are doctors out there who listen and sincerely engage with their patients. There are even a few doctors who remember how to make repairs without using synthetic mesh–they are worth finding.

MESH IS NOT FOR BODIES 9
It’s human nature to kick ourselves in the ass.  Guilt comes too easily for most of us.  It may be because we like to believe we are in control of most things and feel we should be. It’s easy to feel like we should have known better, especially when we start doing more research and realize just how dangerous mesh is.  Then we wish that, somehow, we would have  known better than the doctors who recommended mesh in the first place.  But, hind-sight is 20/20 and most of us do not believe we know better than our doctors until we wind up dealing with all kinds of unnecessary mesh complications. – by DebC on MeshMeNot

 


“Even paranoids have real enemies”—Delmore Schwartz 1913-1966


 

The definition of paranoia is “an unfounded or exaggerated distrust of others.” When thousands of mesh victims gather and share stories of horrific infections, injuries, illnesses, disabilities, and even death, distrust of the maker of the product is certainly not unfounded.
If you’d like to read more on this mesh topic and many others, start at Deb C’s website here and look around while you’re there for more of her well-researched and fascinating writings.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Peggy Day is working on a book to combine all these stories. This is an excerpt from Pelvis in Flames: Your Pelvic Mesh Owner’s Guide. Your input is welcome to help make Pelvis in Flames the book you need to read.

If you’d like to join an online support group and learn about erosion, partial removals, surgeons, or just find out that you are not alone, join my group, Surgical Mesh or check the list of support groups here.

Subscribe to PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com to learn more about pelvic mesh. I’d like to hear from you if you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic. Comment below or email me privately at daywriter1@gmail.com..

twitter-iconfacebook-icon



22+ Crucial Questions to Ask Surgeon Before Pelvic Mesh Surgery

 1. What is the operation being recommended? Is it necessary?

 2. Why is the operation necessary?

 3. I am aware that a bladder sling or hernia mesh is made of polypropylene and the material is the same, whether it is called a “tape” or “minitape.” I do not want polypropylene in my body. Are you willing to do the surgery without the use of synthetic surgical mesh? {__ I am allergic to polypropylene (check if applies to you).}

4. What are my alternatives to this procedure? (for example: I am aware the Burch Procedure has the same rate of success as synthetic surgical mesh. Are you able to do an alternative procedure)

 5. What are the benefits of the surgery and how long will those benefits last?

 6. What are the risks and possible complications of having the operation?

 7. What are my possibilities if I choose not to have the surgery?

 8. How many of these surgeries have you performed?

9. For which specialty do you have a board certification?  Urology, Urogynecology, Gynecology, General Surgery, Colorectal Surgery?  Other?

10. Where will my surgery be performed?

11. How long will my operation take?

12. Why type of anesthesia will be administered? If it is not a hospital, is there emergency equipment if I should have trouble with anesthesia? What is the plan for emergencies? 

13. What type of incision will be used? Will it be an open procedure, minimally invasive or laparoscopic?

14. Do you have to cut close to larger nerves to complete this operation?

15. What are my chances for getting new nerve damage?

16. What is the risk of mesh erosion into healthy organs from this surgery?

17. What are my chances for getting a wound infection? What is the hospital’s nosocomial infection rate? Do you provide antibiotic prophylaxis?

18. What are the specific risks of this procedure?

19. What will my operation cost? What else will I be charged for?

20. What can I expect during recovery?

21. How will my life be changed for the good or bad after this operation?

22. How many future surgeries might I expect after this surgery if there are complications?

Added question: Are you planning to have a salesmen in the operating room with you? I do__ do not___ prefer to have a sales representative in the OR with me.

(Click here for download of copy with fill-in-the-blanks.)


 

 POLY IS FOR ADA RAMPS


 

Places to check-up on your surgeon

It is important to have confidence in the doctor who will be doing your surgery and you can make sure that he or she is qualified. Each state licenses its physicians. Take the time to search for:

       “[Name of State] physician license verification” for your own surgeon.

Make sure to check for disciplinary actions taken or whether the license is current. Example here.

  • Ask your primary doctor, your local medical society, or health insurance company for information about the doctor or surgeon’s experience with the procedure.
  • Make certain the doctor or surgeon is affiliated with an accredited health care facility. When considering surgery, where it is done is often as important as who is doing the procedure.

From PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com                        © Peggy Day November 27, 2015

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Peggy Day is working on a book to combine all these stories. This is an excerpt from Pelvis in Flames: Your Pelvic Mesh Owner’s Guide. Your input is welcome to help make Pelvis in Flames the book you need to read.

If you’d like to join an online support group and learn about erosion, partial removals, surgeons, or just find out that you are not alone, join my group, Surgical Mesh or check the list of support groups here.

Subscribe to PelvicMeshOwnersGuide.com to learn more about pelvic mesh. I’d like to hear from you if you are helped by what you read here or if you need to know more about any particular topic. Comment below or email me privately at daywriter1@gmail.com..

twitter-iconfacebook-icon